Dealer who purposefully undervalued his goods to avoid legal scrutiny cannot receive any benefits: HC
Union of India v. HC Radha Fragrance – [2023] Orders for the provision of Pan Masala and chewing tobacco were given to the petitioner. The
Union of India v. HC Radha Fragrance – [2023] Orders for the provision of Pan Masala and chewing tobacco were given to the petitioner. The
State of Jharkhand vs. Sidhi Vinayak Enterprises – 2023 The department conducted a search of the petitioner’s premises in search of inappropriate ITC availment. In
GSTN Update According to section 2(62) of the 2013 Companies Act, a “One Person Company” is a company with a single member. Those registering as
GST Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise v. Anil Kumar – [2023] The petitioner was a street trader who wished to get a GST registration for
State of Bihar v. Vihaan Networks Ltd. – (2023) The petitioner was a GST-registered company that got a show cause notice (SCN) from the department
Union of India v. Ultratech Cement Ltd. – [2023] The petitioner filed a writ petition contesting the adjudication ruling, alleging that no personal hearing was
The petitioner filed a writ petition contesting the adjudication ruling, alleging that no personal hearing was provided before the order was made. Moreover, it was
Union of India v. Y. B. Constructions (P.) Ltd. – [2023] In a writ case submitted to the High Court, the petitioner requested that the
Punjab Vimal Alloys (P.) Ltd., Advance Rulings Authority, In re- [2023] The applicant was operating a furnace and acquiring ferrous alloys, scrap, natural gas, and
Assistant Commissioner of Central Taxes v. Wipro Ltd. – [2023] By submitting GSTR-1, the petitioner’s mistake of reporting the incorrect GSTIN number on the invoices
State of U.P. v. Yash Kothari Public Charitable Trust – [2023] The petitioner was a public charity trust that was registered. A summary order was
Update on GSTN In addition to NIC-IRP, GSTN has added four additional IRPs (Invoice Reporting Portals) to its database for reporting e-invoices. Due to this,
DSG Papers (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT/Dy.CIT v. DSG Papers (P.) Ltd. – [2023] A private limited company called the assesses worked in the of manufacturing
Commissioner of State Taxes and Excise in the case of HC Skylight Manpower and Hospitality Services – [2023] With relation to the assessment years 2019–20,
Central Goods and Services Tax Commissioner v. HC Mahajan Fabrics (P.) Ltd. The petitioner had submitted a request for a refund in accordance with Section